It is quite common for various parties online to exchange signed documents in signed form (such as contracts for remote work). Would these documents have any power in a court of law? Is it necessary to use the original documents for them to have any legal value?
8,443 4 4 gold badges 27 27 silver badges 59 59 bronze badges asked Aug 23, 2015 at 13:37 JonathanReez JonathanReez 4,751 4 4 gold badges 35 35 silver badges 65 65 bronze badges Commented Aug 23, 2015 at 15:07tl;dr: It depends on what the agreement is about.
The form required for a document varies with the type of agreement or contract. This will depend on jurisdiction and specifics, but general rules are:
In practice it is good to be able to prove that a contract exists if there is a dispute. For that reason, it is prudent to use a form that allows a (certain degree of) proof. In that respect, a paper document or a document with an officially recognized electronic signature is better, a scanned document or an email are usually okay, a verbal agreement is likely to be problematic.
What if I have a contract with another party which I signed on paper, and which is completed/done/no problems. Then this party scan my signature to JPG file, copy/paste it in another MS Word document, which I have no clue and I do not know about it and later try to sue me because I am not doing what I have to do according to the contract. Is this MS Word document with my scanned signature in JPG file has any legal power (in Common law or in most of the countries)? They can try to copy my signature with the pen, but I believe experts can find out if signature was real or fake.
Commented Oct 19, 2018 at 9:26@Zlelik: Your question looks similar to this one: How to prove the genuinity/nongenuinity of a signature?. If it is not, consider asking a new question :-).
Commented Oct 19, 2018 at 10:09There's a good discussion on "electronic" signatures at Wikipedia.
Electronic signatures have been used for a very long time and the New Hampshire Supreme Court ruled that telegraphs could be used as valid contracts back in 1869.
The article linked above provides links to a large number of international jurisdictions and their electronic signature laws.
In the U.S. an electronic signature is defined as "an electronic sound, or process, attached to or logically associated with a contract or other record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record." This includes facsimile transmissions or even morse code.
The Uniform Electronic Transactions Act lays out the definition of electronic signatures in the United States. It has been adopted by 47 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Just because a state didn't adopt the UETA (Illinois, New York and Washington) doesn't mean they don't accept electronic signatures - it just means they have adopted their own legislation regarding electronic signatures.